![]() |
![]() |
The skin cancer epidemic is a worldwide phenomenon. In 1978 there were approximately 480,000 cases
of non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States alone. This is expected to rise to over one million in
1994(6). Malignant melanoma is growing at a rate of 7% per year in the United States. In 1991 cancer
experts estimated that there would be about 32,000 cases during the year of which 6,500 would be
fatal(7). In Canada melanoma incidence rose by 6% per year for men and by 4.6% per year for women
during the period 1970-1986(8). Australia has the highest melanoma rate in the world. For men the rate
doubled between 1980 and 1987 and for women it increased by more than 50%(9). It is now estimated
that by age 75 two out of three Australians will have been treated for some form of skin cancer(10).
If the ozone layer has not yet changed significantly except at the poles, then what is causing the enormous increase in skin cancer?
The sunscreen connection Drs. Cedric and Frank Garland of the University of California are the foremost opponents of the use of chemical sunscreens. They point out that, although sunscreens do protect against sunburn, there is no scientific proof that they protect against melanoma or basal cell carcinoma in humans(11). There is, however, some evidence that regular use of sunscreens helps prevent the formation of actinic keratoses, the precursors of squamous cell carcinoma(12). The Garland brothers strongly believe that the increased use of chemical sunscreens is the primary cause of the skin cancer epidemic. They emphasize that people using sunscreen tend to stay longer in the sun because they do not get a sunburn - they develop a false sense of security(7). Chemical sunscreens are formulated to absorb UVB radiation, they let most of the UVA rays through(7). UVA rays penetrate deeper into the skin and are strongly absorbed by the melanocytes which are involved both in melanin production (sun tanning) and in melanoma formation(11). UVA rays also have a depressing effect on the immune system(13). ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION UVA rays constitute 90-95% of the ultraviolet light reaching the earth. They have a relatively long wavelength (320-400 nm) and are not absorbed by the ozone layer. UVA light penetrates the furthest into the skin and is involved in the initial stages of suntanning. UVA tends to suppress the immune function and is implicated in premature aging of the skin(2,13,14). UVB rays are partially absorbed by the ozone layer and have a medium wavelength (290-320 nm). They do not penetrate the skin as far as the UVA rays do and are the primary cause of sunburn. They are also responsible for most of the tissue damage which results in wrinkles and aging of the skin and are implicated in cataract formation(2). UVC rays have the shortest wavelength (below 290 nm) and are almost totally absorbed by the ozone layer. As the ozone layer thins UVC rays may begin to contribute to sunburning and premature aging of the skin(2). All forms of ultraviolet radiation are believed to contribute to the development of skin cancer(2).
|
Most chemical sunscreens contain from 2 to 5% of benzophenone or its derivatives (oxybenzone,
benzophenone-3) as their active ingredient. Benzophenone is one of the most powerful free radical
generators known to man. It is used in industrial processes to initiate chemical reactions and promote
cross-linking(15). Benzophenone is activated by ultraviolet light. The absorbed energy breaks
benzophenone's double bond to produce two free radical sites. The free radicals desperately look for a
hydrogen atom to make them "feel whole again"(15). They may find this hydrogen atom among the other
ingredients of the sunscreen, but it is conceivable that they could also find it on the surface of the skin
and thereby initiate a chain reaction which could ultimately lead to melanoma and other skin cancers.
Researchers at the Harvard Medical School have recently discovered that psoralen, another ultraviolet
light-activated free radical generator, is an extremely efficient carcinogen. They found that the rate of
squamous cell carcinoma among patients with psoriasis, who had been repeatedly treated with UVA light
after a topical application of psoralen, was 83 times higher than among the general population(16).
The benefits of sunlight Dr. Gordon Ainsleigh in California believes that the use of sunscreens causes more cancer deaths than it prevents. He estimates that the 17% increase in breast cancer observed between 1991 and 1992 may be the result of the pervasive use of sunscreens over the past decade(20). Recent studies have also shown a higher rate of melanoma among men who regularly use sunscreens and a higher rate of basal cell carcinoma among women using sunscreens(11,21). Dr. Ainsleigh estimates that 30,000 cancer deaths in the United States alone could be prevented each year if people would adopt a regimen of regular, moderate sun exposure(20). Although the medical establishment still strongly supports the use of sunscreens there is a growing consensus among progressive researchers that the use of sunscreens does not prevent skin cancer and, as a matter of fact, may promote skin cancers as well as colon and breast cancer.
The bottom line
SUNSCREENS Sunscreens are designed to protect against sunburn (UVB rays) and generally provide little protection against UVA rays. They come in two forms: CHEMICAL SUNSCREENS contain chemicals such as benzophenone or oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) as the active ingredient. They prevent sunburn by absorbing the ultraviolet (UVB) rays(2). PHYSICAL SUNSCREENS contain inert minerals such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, or talc and work by reflecting the ultraviolet (UVA and UVB) rays away from the skin(2). A sunscreen with a SPF of 15 filters out approximately 94% of the UVB rays. One with a SPF of 30 filters out 97%. The SPF applies for UVB rays only. The protection provided against UVA rays in chemical sunscreens is about 10% of the UVB rating(26).
The saga of sunscreens and skin cancer is far from over. Research is continuing and new findings are being published at an accelerated pace. But until we know the whole story, it would seem prudent to take precautions based on what we do know. |
REFERENCES
Vol 12, No 12, December 1994, pp.17-19 |
![]() |
![]() |