![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
TUCSON, ARIZONA. A study based on a group of women from Saudi Arabia,
mean age 48 years, recently reported in The American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition. This case control study population was
drawn from patients admitted to hospital between June and August 2009.
Breast cancer cases had significantly lower levels of
25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D than controls (9.4 vs. 15.4 ng/mL).
In comparison with those in the highest vitamin category (= 20 ng/mL),
women with 25(OH)D levels < 10 had a 6-fold increase in incidence and
those between 10 and 20 ng/mL had a 4-fold increase. A level of 20 ng/mL
is still not sufficient and the low levels even for a group recruited in
the summer presumably reflects the darker skin type and the likelihood
of reduced exposure to UV radiation associated with cultural dress
practices and an indoor lifestyle.
These results are consistent with numerous studies supporting the
view that women need vitamin D levels exceeding 20 ng/mL, a recommendation
still seen. In fact, a study published in July 2009 in Annals
of Epidemiology found that raising 25(OH)D levels to 40-60 ng/mL
would prevent 58,000 new cases of breast cancer and three-quarters
of deaths from this disease in the US and Canada. Achieving these
levels with supplementation is simple and inexpensive, and emphasizes
that everyone should know their 25(OH)D number.
Yousef FM, Jacobs ET, Kang PT et al. Vitamin D status and breast
cancer in Saudi Arabian women: case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr
2013 July;98(1):105-10
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |