|
Support for an increased vitamin D intake
TORONTO, CANADA. The current RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance) for vitamin-D
is 400 IU/day (10 micrograms/day). Researchers at the University of Toronto now
provide convincing evidence that this RDA is far too low. They point out that a
blood serum level of less than 40-50 nmol/L of 25(OH)D (the active metabolite of
vitamin-D) indicates deficiency and that a level of 75 to 100 nmol/L is required
for optimum health.
The researchers carried out a clinical experiment involving 61 healthy men and
women. The participants were assigned to receive either 1000 IU (25 micrograms)
or 4000 IU (100 micrograms) of vitamin-D3 for a three-month period starting
between January and February. At baseline (before supplementation) 62 per cent
of these presumably healthy Canadians were found to be vitamin-D deficient
[25(OH)D concentration below 40 nmol/L] and 16 per cent were severely so
[25(OH)D below 25 nmol/L].
The supplementation increased the average 25(OH)D level to 69 nmol/L in the 25
micrograms/day group and to 96 nmol/L in the 100 micrograms/day group. The 25-
microgram dosage was sufficient to increase the 25(OH)D level to the desirable
75 nmol/L or higher in 35 per cent of the subjects. The 100-microgram dosage
achieved this aim in 88 per cent of the subjects. There were no significant
increases in serum calcium level and no adverse effects. The researchers
conclude that 100 micrograms/day (4000 IU/day) of vitamin-D3 is a safe and
desirable intake. They very specifically caution that their findings regarding
vitamin-D3 (cholecalciferol) cannot be applied to the synthetic version of
vitamin-D2 (ergocalciferol), the form most often used in North America.
Vitamin-D2 is far more toxic than vitamin-D3 and produces unique metabolites not
generated by vitamin-D3. The researchers are very "down" on vitamin-D2 and say,
"It is an anachronism to regard vitamin-D2 as a vitamin."
Vieth, Reinhold, et al. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D intake exceeding the
lowest observed adverse effect level. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Vol. 73, February 2001, pp. 288-94 [47 references]
|