![]() |
![]() |
EDITORIALIn this issue we commence a new series of articles on the prostate and its problems. The articles will be written by William Ware and myself and will cover causes, symptoms, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of the four most common prostate problems – prostate congestion, prostate inflammation (prostatitis), prostate enlargement (benign prostatic hyperplasia), and prostate cancer. We will cover both alternative and conventional approaches to prevention and treatment including protocols based on herbs and supplements as well as newer methods for heat and ultra sound based treatment of prostate cancer. This is essential reading for our male subscribers and their significant others. The attack on vitamin E by the medical establishment continues with yet another article describing negative results obtained in a group of elderly, very sick patients. These results are not really surprising, but prompt me to once again emphasize that vitamin E should always be taken in the mixed form (gamma and alpha tocopherol) and always together with vitamin C. Also in this issue we report that breast cancer is linked to stress, infants need greater exposure to dirt to build up immunity, parents should not rely solely on sunscreens to protect their children, and a comprehensive study concludes that both vitamin E and vitamin C are entirely safe. Don't forget, if you need to restock your supplements, by ordering from my web "store" you will receive a 20% discount on already bargain prices. You can find the "store" at www.yourhealthbase.com/vitamins.htm Enjoy!
Wishing you good health,
|
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
After reading the article in International Health News regarding inflammation I am trying to discern
whether I am doing the right thing. My last CRP was 8.3. Statins (crestor) lowered it but I am afraid of these
medications. I am taking Carlson's fish oils, enteric coated ASA 81mg, corrected my diet and exercising (5'6"-
142 lb). Heart disease is genetic for me. I am taking Tricor for triglycerides that were over 800 and now in
control. Recent A1C was 6.5 though FBS was 95. Sounds like inflammation is playing havoc in my body. Going
to a rheumatologist this week. Already saw a cardiologist who cracked on anything natural and is only into pill
pushing. Any suggestions?
SLG, USA
Editor: Yes, it does seem that you could have a systemic inflammation. I would try Zyflamend or
Zyflamend PM. This is a turmeric based herbal compound that is a very effective anti-inflammatory. Also, you
may find that fish oils (about 3 grams/day) should be enough to keep your triglycerides under control - so you
may be able to dispense with the Tricor - with your doctor's agreement, of course. As far as exercise is
concerned it should not be too vigorous since this would aggravate the inflammation. A gentle walk once or
twice a day would be better for the next month or so. I am a 48-year-old woman with gluten intolerance, arthritis, and an undifferentiated immune system disorder. My doctor wants me to take a good multi-vitamin, pycnogenol and fish oil. I am looking for a multi-vitamin that is gluten free. Every time I write a manufacturer, they respond but don't know whether their product is gluten free. Can you recommend a gluten free multi-vitamin for me? TMY, USA Editor: Women's Multistart and Women's Plus Multistart are good all-round multivitamins. I checked with the manufacturer (Natural Factors) and they assured me that they are both gluten-free. Both products are available through my web "store" at a 20% discount at www.yourhealthbase.com/vitamins.htm I am a student in college and I would like to prepare a speech on the massive consumption of vitamin B12 in energy drinks and sublingual supplements, and how it "might", if it even does, cause a tolerance to build just as caffeine does. I understand that tolerances build because receptors burn out and do not function adequately so more is needed to insure proper function. Will this massive consumption of B12 that teenagers and young adults alike indulge in lead to a mild addiction to the vitamin in order to simply stay awake after long-term consumption? NF, USA Editor: The subject of over-consumption of vitamin B12 is indeed an interesting one, but unfortunately, one about which I know very little. Certainly, overdosing with vitamin B12 could put a load on the production of intrinsic factor which, in turn, could have negative long-term effects. However, I have no medical evidence to back up this suggestion.
|
ABSTRACTS
Breast cancer linked to stress
SZCZECIN, POLAND. Polish researchers report that psychological stress is a powerful risk factor for the
development of breast cancer. Their study involved 257 women who had undergone breast cancer surgery
during the period 1993-1998 and 565 controls who were free of breast cancer. The participants were questioned
in detail about their diet, lifestyle, and reproductive history and also reported exposure to major stressful life
events, stress of daily activity, and work-related stress. After adjusting for age and other known risk factors, the
researchers concluded that women whose daily life was stressful, who had experienced major stressful life
events (divorce, loss of spouse, etc) and suffered from depression had a 3.7 times higher risk for breast cancer
than did women who did not experience such stress. Work-related stress, on its own, was associated with a
statistically non-significant increase in breast cancer risk of 16%.
Let them eat dirt!LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM. Allergic diseases are on the rise. Some 300 million people worldwide now suffer from asthma and it is estimated that another 100 million will be added to their ranks over the next 20 years. Allergic rhinitis (including hay fever and reactions to dust mites and cat dander) affects 40% of all American children and peanut allergies doubled between 1997 and 2002. Clearly something has gone awry – the question is what? A few years ago it was thought that the widespread use of vaccination was to blame (hygiene hypothesis) because it prevented childhood infections that normally would have helped teach the immune system how to react appropriately to foreign invaders. This hypothesis has now been pretty well discredited with the discovery, by Japanese scientists, that the allergic response is not due to an imbalance between T1 and T2 helper cells as postulated by the hygiene hypothesis, but rather to reduced effectiveness of a newly discovered class of T-cells called regulatory T-cells. These cells hold back an excessive response by T helper cells and thus prevent the allergic response. There is now increasing evidence that exposure to microbes contained in dirt, untreated water, and farm animals is essential for the proper development of regulatory T-cells.
Studies in Australia, Europe and the US have consistently shown that children growing up in a rural environment
have a far smaller risk of developing allergies than do children reared in an urban environment. Work is now
underway to find out exactly what it is in the rural environment that primes children to avoid allergies.
Vitamin E in heart disease and cancer preventionHAMILTON, CANADA. A group of international researchers has completed a study to determine the effect of vitamin E supplementation on cancer and heart disease incidence and mortality. The original trial (HOPE) was begun in 1993 and included 9541 older patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. The patients all had a history of coronary or peripheral arterial disease, prior stroke, or diabetes plus at least one other cardiovascular risk factor, and most of them were taking one or more pharmaceutical drugs – in other words, not a healthy group of people. The patients were randomized to receive either placebo or 400 IU/day of natural source vitamin E (alpha- tocopherol acetate) for an average of 4.5 years. At the end of this period the researchers concluded that vitamin E supplementation does not decrease the incidence or mortality from cancer and does not decrease the number of cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes) in this group of high-risk patients. The trial was continued for another 2.5 years (HOPE-TOO) with much the same results except that a 13% increase in the rate of heart failure was observed among the patients taking vitamin E.
The researchers speculate that the disappointing results may be due to the potential for alpha-tocopherol
(vitamin E) to become a pro-oxidant under certain conditions. (Editor's Note: This is why vitamin E should
always be taken in conjunction with vitamin C). Another possibility is that supplementing with alpha-tocopherol,
on its own, could have disturbed the balance with gamma-tocopherol. (Editor's Note: This is why vitamin E
should always be taken as part of a mixture of other tocopherols and tocotrienols). The researchers conclude
that vitamin E supplements should not be used in patients with vascular disease or diabetes. Editor's comment: This study should not discourage healthy people from supplementing in order to protect their health and well-being. As I have, on numerous occasions, pointed out the primary benefit of antioxidant supplementation is to PREVENT disease. It seems that whenever the medico-pharmaceutical establishment wishes to discredit an antioxidant they totally ignore this basic fact and gleefully report that it does not stop seriously ill patients from dying. All chronic diseases have a certain lag time before they become clinically manifest. Cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, prostate cancer, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, etc. do not happen all of a sudden from one day to the next – they develop slowly over a long period of time (the latency period). What antioxidants do is that they prolong this latency period very significantly, in many cases, providing complete protection from disease during a person's lifetime. I am much less convinced that the antioxidant property of vitamin C, vitamin E, etc. plays a major role in slowing down or reversing already serious manifest disease, although there is some indication that very large intravenous doses of vitamin C may be helpful in slowing the progression of certain cancers, and that large doses of vitamin E may help slow down Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. So, should you continue to supplement with vitamin-E to protect your health? – ABSOLUTELY!! Two very large studies involving over 100,000 female nurses and male health professionals found that supplementation with 100 IU/day or more of vitamin E is associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of developing heart disease. Vitamin E has also been found to protect against heart attacks (400 or 800 IU/day) and has been found helpful in preventing diabetes, cataracts, Alzheimer's disease, and several other conditions (see www.yourhealthbase.com/vitamin_E.htm) Recent research has shown that it is important to take vitamin-E as a combination of gamma- and alpha- tocopherol (about a 3:1 ratio) and with adjuvant amounts of other tocopherols and tocotrienols. In such a complete formulation 100 to 200 IU/day of alpha-tocopherol would likely be quite sufficient. Vitamin E should always be taken in combination with vitamin-C, and preferably with alpha-lipoic acid and selenium as well in order to maximize its beneficial effect and prevent any pro-oxidant effect. The optimum daily intake for an individual depends on many factors, including the intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids and the degree of exposure to air pollution and toxic chemicals. Higher dosages may be indicated for women suffering from premenstrual or menopausal problems, for smokers, for people engaging in heavy, outdoor exercise, and for people having a family history of cancer. A large intake of fish or fish oils has been shown to increase the requirement for vitamin E quite significantly. Inorganic iron (ferrous sulphate) destroys vitamin-E and oral contraceptives deactivate it to some degree. So vitamin E should be taken with the main meal to optimize absorption and at least 6 hours before or after taking an iron supplement or a birth control pill. Vitamin E remains in the body for a long time, so it can be taken once a day or once every second day as convenient.
Review finds high intakes of vitamins E and C are safeWASHINGTON, DC. Many studies suggest that the antioxidants vitamins E and C can help promote overall good health. Dietary supplementation with these vitamins is widespread in the Western world, with many individuals taking more than the recommended dietary allowances. Much of the scientific literature on these vitamins has recently been reviewed by the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a group of researchers from England, Germany, Switzerland and the United States. The scientists analysed 95 references, including clinical trials and epidemiological studies in humans.
They found that the supplements are safe for adults at intakes up to 1600 IU daily for vitamin E (equivalent to
1073 mg of natural vitamin E) and up to 2000 mg daily for vitamin C. No consistent evidence of adverse effects
was found at these intakes among healthy participants or those with a range of diseases. The review found that
trials have consistently shown no adverse effects of high vitamin E intakes including no evidence of bleeding
effects. The recent, controversial meta-analysis on vitamin E from Johns Hopkins University was reviewed, and
mortality was found to be increased only in diabetics and heart disease patients consuming over 2000 IU a day.
Similarly, a number of vitamin C supplementation studies have not found any grounds for concern over safety
apart from occasional gastrointestinal upset. The safe upper intake levels set by the Food and Nutrition Board of
the US Institute of Medicine stand at 1000 mg for vitamin E (any form) and 2000 mg for vitamin C. These figures
are supported by the consensus of published studies, concludes the review. The authors believe that the review
constitutes reassuring evidence for consumers and doctors that vitamins E and C, taken at the most commonly
available doses, do not cause adverse side effects or create other safety issues.
Aspirin and cardiovascular protection in womenBOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Evidence shows that long-term low-dose aspirin is effective at reducing the risk of heart attack in men. It appears to have little effect on stroke risk. The effects in women are less well established. With over 50 million Americans taking a daily dose to prevent illness, and the risk of serious intestinal bleeding that aspirin brings, it is important to quantify the benefits as accurately as possible. Researchers from Harvard Medical School investigated the effects of aspirin in 39,876 women taking part in the ongoing Women's Health Study. The participants, all 45 years of age or above, were randomly assigned to take either 100 mg of aspirin or a placebo every other day. They were followed for 10 years, with the researchers recording first major cardiovascular disease (CVD), incorporating nonfatal heart attacks, nonfatal strokes, or deaths from cardiovascular causes. A total of 477 major cardiovascular events occurred in the aspirin group as compared to 522 events in the placebo group. This corresponds to a non-significant 9 per cent reduction in the overall risk of a major cardiovascular event. The reduction in risk of stroke was however significant, at 17 per cent, mainly due to a 24 per cent reduction in ischemic stroke (in which part of the brain does not get sufficient blood for a period of time). Detailed analysis showed that major CVD was reduced with aspirin use among women over 65, but not among those aged 65 or younger. The aspirin group experienced a 40 per cent higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion.
The researchers strengthened their observations with further analysis using an additional 55,580 participants
from five other randomized trials. They conclude that aspirin lowers the risk of stroke but does not affect the risk
of CVD. The findings to date, therefore, show opposite effects in men and women for long-term aspirin use to
prevent cardiovascular events. The reasons for this difference are unclear, and require further exploration.
Nevertheless, aspirin has well-established benefits for both men and women with known cardiovascular
disease.
Parents should not rely solely on sunscreenTUBINGEN, GERMANY. Moles on the skin (melanocytic nevi) can, in a small number of cases, eventually develop into melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer. The importance of moles lies in the identification of those with potential for malignant change, for example, enlargement, altered pigmentation, asymmetry, irregularity of the surface or edge, inflammation, bleeding, ulceration, itching or nodules. Evidence suggests that individuals with a large number of moles have an above average risk of melanoma. Researchers from the University of Tubingen gathered data from 1,812 German children aged 2 to 7 years. They measured the number of moles each child had, and interviewed the parents about the child's sun exposure and use of sunscreen. Three-quarters of the parents said they almost always put sunscreen on their children when playing in the sun. A similar percentage said their children usually wore t-shirts over their bathing suits when at the beach or outdoor pool, and about 17 per cent said their children wore shorts in the sun. Those who often wore t-shirts and shorts at the beach or outdoor pool had significantly fewer moles than children who typically wore only bathing suits. However, no clear relationship was found between sunscreen use and the number of moles on the children.
The researchers conclude that randomized trials are needed to clarify the relationship between moles,
sunscreen and protective clothing. They add that parents should be advised to protect their children primarily
through sun avoidance and protective clothing. Although sunscreens should continue to be applied to exposed
areas like the hands and face, parents should also be advised not to rely solely on sunscreens for
protection.
Runners need to monitor fluid intakeBOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS. Hyponatremia is an abnormally low concentration of sodium in body fluids. It is a major cause of death, life-threatening seizures or coma among long-distance runners. Previous studies have implicated excessive fluid intake, but have been small or restricted to runners presenting for medical attention. Harvard Medical School researchers have undertaken the largest study to date of hyponatremia in marathon runners to identify its incidence and principal risk factors. They approached runners in the 2002 Boston marathon before the race and recruited 766 elite and non-elite runners. Demographic information and level of training for the race were determined, and they were weighed at the start and finish. Blood samples were taken after the race, along with data on fluid intake. Analysis showed that thirteen per cent of the runners had hyponatremia (a serum sodium concentration of 135 mmol or less per liter) at the finish line. Of these, 0.6 per cent had critical hyponatremia (120 mmol or less per liter). Excessive fluid intake was found to be the most important factor contributing to hyponatremia. Runners who lost weight during the race were at much lower risk. A race time of over 4 hours was also significant - it led to over seven times the risk of hyponatremia compared with a time under 3.5 hours. A low body mass index (less than 20) also increased the risk. Contrary to earlier studies, women did not develop hyponatremia significantly more than men. Also, the type of drink consumed (water or sports drink) was not a factor. The researchers conclude that hyponatremia occurs in a substantial portion of non-elite marathon runners (racing time over 4 hours), and estimate that it affected approximately 1,900 runners in the Boston marathon. They suggest that the public be better informed about the risk factors that are linked to this potentially life- threatening condition.
Experts from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center add that marathon running is relatively safe,
with less than one death in 50,000, usually due to congenital heart disease. But they believe that the global
recommendation for fluid replacement during racing may not be optimal for all runners, and individual fluid-
replacement schedules are to be encouraged.
Acupuncture may relieve pelvic pain in pregnancyGOTHENBURG, SWEDEN. Pelvic girdle pain is common among pregnant women, with one in three affected suffering severe pain. It is thought to be caused by hormones affecting the flexibility of ligaments and muscles in preparation for labour. A research team from Gothenburg's Institute for the Health of Women and Children investigated the effectiveness of acupuncture to relieve this condition. They compared standard treatment (a home exercise routine), standard treatment plus acupuncture, and standard treatment plus stabilising exercises aimed at improving mobility and strength, each treatment given for six weeks. Participants were 386 women seen at 27 Swedish maternity care centers. They were between 12 and 31 weeks of gestation and experiencing pelvic girdle pain. The women given acupuncture had significantly less pain than the other two groups. This applied to both self-reported pain using a recognized scale and pain assessed by an independent examiner in the morning and in the evening. The stabilising exercise group had more pain than the acupuncture group but less pain than the standard treatment group.
The researchers conclude that treatment with acupuncture and stabilising exercises offers clear advantages and
can be seen as a useful addition to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy. This finding is
supported by previous evidence of a beneficial effect of stabilising exercises adapted for pregnancy as well as
evidence that acupuncture can have a pain-relieving effect for patients with low back pain. Although
acupuncture may well prove helpful in this condition, there was no 'sham acupuncture' group, so the placebo
effect may be a factor. Further trials are necessary to rule out the placebo effect, and to establish the ideal
method of acupuncture if it is shown to be beneficial. |
NEWSBRIEFS
Are prostate cancers overtreated?
Use of herbs growing in the US.
Roundup kills more than weeds.
Marijuana drug approved in Canada.
|
RESEARCH REPORT
The Prostate: Small Gland – Big Problems |
International Health News is published 10 times a year by Hans R. Larsen MSc ChE 1320 Point Street, Victoria, BC, Canada V8S 1A5 Phone: (250) 384-2524 E-mail: editor@yourhealthbase.com URL: http://www.yourhealthbase.com Copyright © 2005 by Hans R. Larsen International Health News does not provide medical advice. Do not attempt self- diagnosis or self-medication based on our reports. Please consult your health-care provider if you wish to follow up on the information presented. |